D-GQ FUEL DISPENSER

D-GQ FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm): Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V): 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp): 1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle: Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type: Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset: Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount: 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display: Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume: 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight : 205kg.

Dimension(L×W×H): 900*620*2180(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 45 20ft: 22

C/DC convert type switch power is universally adopted in fuel dispenser. Diagram 3-13: Structural sketch map of liner voltage stabilizing power Diagram 3-14: Structural sketch map of switch stable voltage power adopted DC/DC converter Diagram 3-15: Structural sketch map of switch voltage stabilizing power adopted pulse transformer fuel dispenser As an electronic component in fuel dispenser, stable voltage power is easily failed and possibly leads to whole trouble of fuel dispenser once appear doesn’t work. Generally, liner voltage stabilizing power adopts 78 series special voltage stabilizing integrated circuit, such as 7805 and 7812, simple design and convenient maintenance. In Diagram 3-16, a popular liner voltage stabilizing power circuit of fuel dispenser is illustrated. Switch power supply adopted pulse transformer will not introduced here, reference with relevant boos when necessary. Diagram 3-16: Circuit diagram of liner voltage stabilizing power These integrated circuits of LM2576, LM4962 AND MC34063A are widely adopted in DC/DC transformer power supply. Intrinsic safety voltage stabilizing power supply in fuel dispenser This kind of direct current is able to employ in flammable and combustible environment only when mounted safety barrier. It also called intrinsic safety voltage stabilizing power supply illustrated in Diagram 3-18. Explosion-proof power supply is only used in explosion-proof box or an atmosphere without explosive gas, including its associated circuit. It is allowed to employ intrinsic safety power in explosive atmosphere, but must in explosion-pr fuel dispenser oof box or an environment without explosive gas. However, its associated circuit is permitted to use in explosive gas atmosphere if meet requirements concerned. The major difference between intrinsic safety power and explosion-proof power is whether install safety barrier. Diagram 3-17: Voltage stabilizin fuel dispenser g power circuit of DC/DC convertor Diagram 3-18: Sketch map of intrinsic safety power The function of setting a safety barrier i

Magstripe　　 Loyalty　　 DeviceResponse　　 fuel dispenser Card OK Card　　 (card Track)　　 Card　　 Validation　　 CardServiceResponse　　 LoyaltySwipe　　 Items rang up　　 completed Magstripe　　 - Tender selected Payment　　 CardServiceRequest DeviceRequest　　 Card　　 CardPaymentLoyaltyAward IN:CardReader　　 Customer　　 OUT:PlsSwipe　　 fuel dispenser Swipes　　 Card　　 DeviceResponse　　 fuel dispenser (card Track)　　

he practical difficulties in negotiating such a convention would be enormous. Just look at the complexities involved in bringing the CTBT into force. In all, 44 countries with nuclear-power or research reactors, including India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, must ratify the treaty before it can take effect. It is not just America s reluc fuel dispenser tance that is causing the delay—though, as the Blix commission rightly says, that ratification would trigger others. The next logical bit of legal scaffolding for a nuclear-freer world would be a fissile-material ban. In theory almost every country supports such a ban (though some, like India, might not mind if the talks dragged on for years). The nuclear five are all thought to have stopped producing uranium and plutonium for weapons; only China refuses to say so publicly. But talks in the UN Conference on Disarmament have stalled over efforts to press America into space and disarmament discussions. Verification concerns are another blow. America argues that a credible verification regime for the treaty would be too costly and intrusive for anyone to accept. Others disagree. But if governments are ever to generate the will to consider steps towards a nuclear zero, the devil at each stage will be in such verification technicalities. The lower the numbers go, the greater the need for confidence that all are indeed cutting their weapons as promised. All weapons states have experience of dismantling warheads and disposing of their innards. But doing that to the satisfaction of all without unintentionally giving away weapons se fuel dispenser crets would need careful preparation (so far only the British government has published thoughts on how this might be done). The difficulties affect not only the nuclear states. All other states that have produced potentially weapons-usable uranium and plutonium would have to account for what they had don fuel dispenser e with the stuff too. Only relatively small quantities—not more than 25 kilos of highly enriched uranium, or eight kilos of pluto